Determinant Factors Affecting the Implementation and Socio-Economic Impact of Waste Bank Policy in Makassar City

Muhamad Jusman; Armin Armin; Nur Indrayati Nur  Indar

doi:10.47667/ijppr.v2i4.108

Authors

Muhamad Jusman Public Administration, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Hasanuddin University, Indonesia
Armin Armin Public Administration, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Hasanuddin University, Indonesia
Nur Indrayati Nur Indar Public Administration, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Hasanuddin University, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47667/ijppr.v2i4.108

Keywords:

Policy Implementation, Socio-Economic Impact, Waste Bank

Abstract

This paper discusses the Determinant Factors Affecting the Implementation and Socio-Economic Impact of the Waste Bank Policy in Makassar City. This research method uses this type of research, namely descriptive qualitative. Several methods of data collection carried out are Interview, Observation and documentation. The results of the study indicate that this central Waste Bank has an obligation to pick up and purchase waste. because so far the Waste Banks that have been formed have collided in the pick-up and purchase areas of waste, so that the Central Garbage Bank is the answer to the problems that have been programmed by the Waste Bank. The average condition of landfills in Indonesia, including Makassar City, is no longer able to accommodate waste and will cause social problems. The economic function of the waste bank is to give a high value to the waste which was originally considered low, does not mean anything and is a big problem and burden for the government and its people

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ailah, M., & Ridwan, M. (2019). Aktualisasi Makna Al-Tuhuru Shatru Al-Iman Melalui Bank Sampah Dalam Meningkatkan Kesehatan Lingkungan. Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Raushan Fikr, 8(1), 63-82.

Aja, O. C., & Al-Kayiem, H. H. (2014). Review of municipal solid waste management options in Malaysia, with an emphasis on sustainable waste-to-energy options. Journal of material cycles and waste management, 16(4), 693-710.

ANAS, A. R. (2019). PROSEDUR PENGADAAN BARANG IMPOR PAPER KRAFT MILIK PT. SEMEN INDONESIA CABANG TUBAN. KARYA TULIS.

Dutt, N., & King, A. A. (2014). The judgment of garbage: End-of-pipe treatment and waste reduction. Management Science, 60(7), 1812-1828.

Ganji, M., Rabet, R., & Sajadi, S. M. (2021). A new coordinating model for green supply chain and batch delivery scheduling with satisfaction customers. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 1-36.

Henry, R. K., Yongsheng, Z., & Jun, D. (2006). Municipal solid waste management challenges in developing countries–Kenyan case study. Waste management, 26(1), 92-100.

Kahhat, R., Kim, J., Xu, M., Allenby, B., Williams, E., & Zhang, P. (2008). Exploring e-waste management systems in the United States. Resources, conservation and recycling, 52(7), 955-964.

Lao, O., Lu, T. T., Nothnagel, M., Junge, O., Freitag-Wolf, S., Caliebe, A., ... & Kayser, M. (2008). Correlation between genetic and geographic structure in Europe. Current Biology, 18(16), 1241-1248.

Matland, R. E. (1995). Synthesizing the implementation literature: The ambiguity-conflict model of policy implementation. Journal of public administration research and theory, 5(2), 145-174.

Poongodi, M., Hamdi, M., Vijayakumar, V., Rawal, B. S., & Maode, M. (2020, September). An effective electronic waste management solution based on blockchain smart contract in 5G communities. In 2020 IEEE 3rd 5G World Forum (5GWF) (pp. 1-6). IEEE.

Wulandari, Y. (2019). THE IMPACT OF WASTE MANAGEMENT ON THE IMPROVEMENT OF ISLAMIC ETHICS OF MADIUN SOCIETY (Doctoral dissertation, UNIDA).