https://igsspublication.com/index.php/ijppr <p><strong>International Journal Papier Public Review</strong> ISSN <strong>2709-023X</strong> covers all areas in Social and Public Studies, Education, Public Health, Management, Economy, Business, Information Technology Management, Knowledge Management, Management Information System, Management Psychology, Management of Enterprises, security and Risk Management, Hospitality Management, Sport Management, Strategic Management, Educational Management, Educational experiences, Special education, School curriculum, Curriculum theory, Academic disciplines, Philosophy of education, Humanities, Law, Anthropology, History, Administration, Public Administration, Journalism, Environmental Studies, Development Studies, International Relation Studies.</p> <p> </p> <p>.</p> Information-Integrated Global Society Studies en-US International Journal Papier Public Review 2709-023X https://igsspublication.com/index.php/ijppr/article/view/203 <p>This research aims to examine and find empirical evidence about the effect of green accounting application, company size, profitability, media disclosure, and the board of commissioner’s size on Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure. This research uses 440 samples from 88 manufacturing companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange in the period 2014-2018. This research is quantitative research using an associative research method with causal relationships. The analytical tool used in this research uses SPSS version 22 in the form of descriptive analysis, normality test, multicollinearity test, heteroscedasticity test, autocorrelation test, coefficient of determination test, f test and t test. The results showed that green accounting had no effect on Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure. Meanwhile, company size, profitability, media disclosure, and the size of the board of commissioners have a positive and significant influence on Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure.</p> Katarina Agnes Copyright (c) 2023 International Journal Papier Public Review https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/ 2023-05-24 2023-05-24 4 2 1 17 10.47667/ijppr.v4i2.203 https://igsspublication.com/index.php/ijppr/article/view/209 <p>This thesis investigates innovative models of governance and collaboration in public administration to address the complexities of a multi-stakeholder landscape. The study explores the principles, characteristics, types, benefits, and challenges of collaborative governance, public-private partnerships, networked governance, and cross-sectoral collaboration. The research utilizes qualitative and quantitative methods, including interviews, surveys, and document analysis, to gather comprehensive insights. The findings showcase the importance of embracing new approaches that involve government agencies, private sector organizations, and civil society groups working together to tackle complex societal challenges. Tables present the key elements of each model, providing a visual comparison of their features and real-world applications. Additionally, the study highlights evaluation frameworks, such as the Logic Model, Results-Based Management (RBM), Theory of Change, Impact Evaluation, and Utilization-Focused Evaluation, to assess effectiveness and measure impact. The thesis contributes to the field of public administration by emphasizing the significance of collaborative governance and cross-sectoral collaboration. The research provides insights for policymakers, public administrators, and practitioners to adopt effective approaches in addressing challenges and achieving desired outcomes. By embracing innovative models of governance and collaboration, public administration can foster cooperation, inclusivity, and collective problem-solving among stakeholders. The study concludes with a call for further research and implementation of these approaches to create a resilient, responsive, and sustainable public administration system that delivers meaningful impact to society.</p> Teniayo Temitope Copyright (c) 2023 International Journal Papier Public Review https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/ 2023-05-26 2023-05-26 4 2 18 28 10.47667/ijppr.v4i2.209