Organizational Activities Through Social Media Communication With Direct Communication

Authors

  • Derius Neuga University of Bucharest
  • Larentiu Nicoulae Silviu University of Bucharest

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47667/ijppr.v2i2.84

Keywords:

Interpersonal communication, Social Media, Organizations

Abstract

Interpersonal contact or contact that is inextricably linked to mass media. When individuals upload things and communicate with other participants, internal contact happens simultaneously with public communication, since whatever is shared can be automatically appreciated and seen by a large audience. With the potential for private information to become available, it is important to pay more attention to the role of social media. Not to stifle its development, but to optimize its utility. It is critical to improve each user's self-awareness, since what they upload will influence their self-image and the relationships they have with other parties. The freedom of expression and the freedom to communicate that social media provides should be used prudently by its consumers. When we share or disseminate knowledge, we must exercise caution and introspection. In other words, while contact through social networking has expanded and become more versatile, this versatility must be reined in to truly enjoy the benefits. Naturally, if we understand the components of organizational communication, as we communicate inside the organisation, we can understand our status in light of the scenario and circumstances. The advancement of the internet facilitated the emergence of modern modes of communication within organizations. Social networking has arrived and is reshaping the way we communicate in today's culture. There is no restriction to the correspondence of distance, time, and space.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aggarwal, V. B., & Gupta, V. S. (2001). Handbook of journalism and mass communication. Concept Publishing Company.

Bandura, A. (2001). Social cognitive theory of mass communication. Media psychology, 3(3), 265-299.

Gangel, K. O., & Canine, S. (2002). Communication and conflict management in churches and Christian organizations. Wipf and Stock Publishers.

Gratz, R. D., & Salem, P. J. (1981). Organizational Communication and Higher Education. AAHE-ERIC/Higher Education Research Report No. 10, 1981.

Kim, H. W. (2001). Modeling inter-and intra-organizational coordination in electronic commerce deployments. Information Technology and Management, 2(3), 335-354.

Konijn, E. A., Utz, S., Tanis, M., & Barnes, S. B. (Eds.). (2008). Mediated interpersonal communication. Routledge.

Liu, W., Xu, W., & John, B. (2021). Organizational Disaster Communication Ecology: Examining Interagency Coordination on Social Media During the Onset of the COVID-19 Pandemic. American Behavioral Scientist, 0002764221992823.

Simpson, C. (2015). Science of coercion: Communication research & psychological warfare, 1945–1960 (Vol. 13). Open Road Media.

Weingart, P., Engels, A., & Pansegrau, P. (2000). Risks of communication: discourses on climate change in science, politics, and the mass media. Public understanding of science, 9(3), 261-284.

West, R. L., Turner, L. H., & Zhao, G. (2010). Introducing communication theory: Analysis and application (Vol. 2). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.

Downloads

Published

2021-04-26

How to Cite

Neuga, D., & Silviu, L. N. . (2021). Organizational Activities Through Social Media Communication With Direct Communication. International Journal Papier Public Review, 2(2), 21-26. https://doi.org/10.47667/ijppr.v2i2.84