Optimizing the Role of Government in Situation-Based Public Services for the Life of Civil Society in Ukraine
Keywords:Government, Public Services, Civil Society
The purpose of this research is to examine how best to measure the effect of government reform on public services in Ukraine. The purpose of this research was to examine the meaning of public service, the function of government, and the difficulties and consequences of implementing these ideas. The study overview defines public service and the government's function in this realm of service to the public. Improving service quality, institutional change, community engagement, protection of human rights, and partnership with the private sector and other partners are often highlighted as means of maximizing government's role. The study's findings highlight the need of investing in strong governance, openness, and citizen engagement in order to provide high-quality public services. Inadequate funding, political instability, opposition to reform, corruption, and a lack of public knowledge are just some of the problems highlighted by an examination of Ukraine's public service sector. In addition, we assess the results and consequences of enhancing the government's role in providing public services in Ukraine. As part of the evaluation process, we aim to enhance service quality, efficiency, excellent management, openness and accountability, public engagement, and equity. Challenges and restrictions in putting these plans into action may, however, undermine them.
Bauhr, M., & Carlitz, R. (2021). When does transparency improve public services? Street‐level discretion, information, and targeting. Public Administration, 99(3), 500-516.
Diegtiar, O. A., Kravchenko, Т. A., Yevmieshkina, O. L., Sych, T. V., & Linetska, Y. M. (2021). Innovative foundations for optimizing the information and communication system of local government. Linguistics and Culture Review, 5(S4), 955-967.
Dobrzykowski, D. (2019). Understanding the downstream healthcare supply chain: Unpacking regulatory and industry characteristics. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 55(2), 26-46.
Gao, X., & Yu, J. (2020). Public governance mechanism in the prevention and control of the COVID-19: information, decision-making and execution. Journal of Chinese Governance, 5(2), 178-197.
Kuran, C. H. A., Morsut, C., Kruke, B. I., Krüger, M., Segnestam, L., Orru, K., ... & Torpan, S. (2020). Vulnerability and vulnerable groups from an intersectionality perspective. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 50, 101826.
Lan, F., Gong, X., Da, H., & Wen, H. (2020). How do population inflow and social infrastructure affect urban vitality? Evidence from 35 large-and medium-sized cities in China. Cities, 100, 102454.
Mano, W., & Milton, V. C. (2020). Civil society coalitions as pathways to PSB reform in Southern Africa. Interactions: Studies in Communication & Culture, 11(2), 135-158.
Shpektorenko, I., Vasylenko, T., Bashtannyk, A., Piatkivskyi, R., Palamarchuk, T., & Akimov, O. (2021). Legal bases of public administration in the context of European integration of Ukraine: questions of formation of a personnel reserve.
Vickerman, R. (2021). Will Covid-19 put the public back in public transport? A UK perspective. Transport Policy, 103, 95-102.
How to Cite
Copyright (c) 2023 International Journal Papier Public Review
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.