Bureaucratic Pathology In Sumalata District Office, North Gorontalo Regency

Authors

  • Widya Kurniati Mohi Public Administration Study Program, Muhammadiyah University of Gorontalo, Indonesia
  • Srihandayani Suprapto Public Administration Study Program, Muhammadiyah University of Gorontalo, Indonesia
  • Liska Yusuf Public Administration Study Program, Muhammadiyah University of Gorontalo, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47667/ijppr.v4i1.184

Keywords:

Pathology, Bureaucracy, District, Sumalata

Abstract

This research aims to determine the pathology of bureaucracy at the Sumalata District Office, North Gorontalo Regency. The research method used is a qualitative with a descriptive approach. The results showed that the Bureaucratic Pathology had not run according to the rules that had been set. From the four indicators to measure the level of bureaucratic pathology, there was one indicator that worked well enough, namely the indicator Due to the internal situation (services). Meanwhile, for the three that have not gone well, it is the perception of managerial style, where the placement of positions is not in accordance with their respective duties. Then the indicators of low knowledge and skills, the existence of an employee’s educational background that is not in accordance with his position. Indicators The actions of officials who violate the law still need to increase awareness in terms of employee discipline at the Sumalata District Office.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Asyikin, N. (2020). Legal politics of bureaucratic reform in really good governance according to prophetical law. Legality: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum, 28(1), 81-95.

Bannister, F. (2001). Dismantling the silos: extracting new value from IT investments in public administration. Information Systems Journal, 11(1), 65-84.

Dwiyanto, A. (2003). Reformasi Tatanan Pemerintahan dan Otonomi Daerah, Yogyakarta: Pusat Studi Kependudukan dan Kebijakan. Universitas Gajah Mada.

Johnson, C. (1975). Japan: who governs? An essay on official bureaucracy. Journal of Japanese Studies, 2(1), 1-28.

Moe, T. M. (1995). Toward a theory of public bureaucracy. Organization theory: From Chester Barnard to the present and beyond, 116.

Robbins, S. P. (1994). Teori Organisasi: Struktur. Desain dan Aplikasi, Terjemahan Jusuf Udaya. Jakarta: PT Arcan

Said, M. U. (2010). Birokrasi di Negara Birokratis (masalah, makna dan dekonstruksi birokrasi Indonesia). Malang: UMM Press.

Setiawan, I. (2014). Rekonstruksi Birokrasi Pemerintahan Daerah.

Sztompka, P. (1996). Trust and emerging democracy: Lessons from Poland. International sociology, 11(1), 37-62.

Thoha, M. (2005). Birokrasi dan politik di Indonesia. cet Kesatu. Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada.

Downloads

Published

2023-01-24

How to Cite

Mohi, W. K., Suprapto, S., & Yusuf, L. (2023). Bureaucratic Pathology In Sumalata District Office, North Gorontalo Regency. International Journal Papier Public Review, 4(1), 34-39. https://doi.org/10.47667/ijppr.v4i1.184