Object-Oriented Cognition Theory, Dawn of a New Scientific Revolution

Authors

  • Mohsen Karimzadeh Najaf Abad University, Iran

Abstract

Cognitive consciousness, the awareness of self and environment through mental processes, remains a central enigma in cognitive science and philosophy. This paper explores cognitive consciousness through the lens of Object-Oriented Cognition, a framework that integrates diverse cognitive domains and provides conceptual tools for addressing epistemological challenges. Two foundational principles are emphasized: first, consciousness inherently unfolds within a temporal context, and second, it is inseparable from the physical organism that houses cognition. Within this framework, cognitive consciousness is not a cognitive object or event but a fundamental substrate enabling the formation and experience of cognitive objects. This substrate facilitates the connection between incoming cognitive stimuli and value functions—mechanisms by which a living being allocates and utilizes internal and external resources. The paper highlights that without the organismal connection, such cognitive processing and meaningful cognitive events cannot occur. Cognitive consciousness, therefore, acts as a dynamic interface that links cognition with physiological and environmental realities, ensuring the functionality and coherence of cognitive behavior. By emphasizing the indispensability of this substrate for the emergence of cognitive events, this research provides a new perspective on the structural role of consciousness in cognition. Although this approach sheds light on the nature of cognitive consciousness, it also identifies open questions, particularly regarding the mechanisms sustaining this substrate and their relation to neural processes issues that invite further inquiry within the Object-Oriented Cognition framework.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Al-Nuaimi, M. N., Bouazza, A., & Abu-Hilal, M. M. (2020). ICT ethics-related cognition among undergraduate students: a grounded theory study from a social constructivist perspective. Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society, 18(4), 589-607. https://doi.org/10.1108/JICES-08-2019-0097

Becker, J., & Niehaves, B. (2007). Epistemological perspectives on IS research: a framework for analysing and systematizing epistemological assumptions. Information Systems Journal, 17(2), 197-214. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2575.2007.00234.x

Détienne, F. (1997). Assessing the cognitive consequences of the object-oriented approach: A survey of empirical research on object-oriented design by individuals and teams. Interacting with computers, 9(1), 47-72. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0953-5438(97)00006-4

Geary, D. C., & Huffman, K. J. (2002). Brain and cognitive evolution: forms of modularity and functions of mind. Psychological bulletin, 128(5), 667.

Goulder, L. H., & Kennedy, D. (2011). Interpreting and estimating the value of ecosystem services. Natural capital: theory and practice of mapping ecosystem services, 15.

Gutiérrez, J. L., Jones, C. G., Strayer, D. L., & Iribarne, O. O. (2003). Mollusks as ecosystem engineers: the role of shell production in aquatic habitats. Oikos, 101(1), 79-90. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0706.2003.12322.x

Kaplan, D. M. (2012). How to demarcate the boundaries of cognition. Biology & Philosophy, 27, 545-570. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10539-012-9308-4

Keijzer, F. (2021). Demarcating cognition: the cognitive life sciences. Synthese, 198(Suppl 1), 137-157. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-020-02797-8

Kjellman, A. (2002). The subject-oriented approach to knowledge and the role of human consciousness. International Review of Sociology/Revue Internationale de Sociologie, 12(2), 223-247. https://doi.org/10.1080/0390670022000012468

Langacker, R. W. (2011). Viewing in cognition and grammar. In Alternative Linguistics (pp. 153-212). John Benjamins Publishing Company. https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.102.06lan

Lieder, F., & Griffiths, T. L. (2020). Resource-rational analysis: Understanding human cognition as the optimal use of limited computational resources. Behavioral and brain sciences, 43, e1. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X1900061X

Tononi, G. (2004). An information integration theory of consciousness. BMC neuroscience, 5, 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2202-5-42

Ule, A. (2015). Consciousness, mind, and spirit: three levels of human cognition. Interdisciplinary Description of Complex Systems: INDECS, 13(4), 488-500. https://doi.org/10.7906/indecs.13.4.1

Van Dijk, J., Kerkhofs, R., Van Rooij, I., & Haselager, P. (2008). Can there be such a thing as embodied embedded cognitive neuroscience?. Theory & Psychology, 18(3), 297-316. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354308089787

Wright, J. S., & Panksepp, J. (2012). An evolutionary framework to understand foraging, wanting, and desire: the neuropsychology of the SEEKING system. Neuropsychoanalysis, 14(1), 5-39. https://doi.org/10.1080/15294145.2012.10773683

Downloads

Published

2025-06-19

How to Cite

Karimzadeh, M. (2025). Object-Oriented Cognition Theory, Dawn of a New Scientific Revolution. Interdisciplinary Journal Papier Human Review, 6(2), 1-3. Retrieved from https://igsspublication.com/index.php/ijphr/article/view/359