Analyzing the Effectiveness of AI-Powered Adaptive Learning Platforms in Mathematics Education
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47667/ijphr.v3i1.226Keywords:
Adaptive Learning, AI-Powered Platforms, Mathematics EducationAbstract
This study looks into the effectiveness of AI-powered adaptive learning systems in mathematics education, with the goal of discovering how they affect student engagement and learning results. The study assessed engagement metrics and pre- and post-assessment scores among students in both experimental and control groups using a quantitative research technique. The results showed that the experimental group, which used the AI-powered platform, had greater engagement metrics, such as interaction frequency and length, than the control group. Furthermore, the experimental group's post-assessment scores increased significantly, showing better mathematical competency. These findings are consistent with previous studies, emphasizing the individualized learning routes enabled by AI technologies. This study highlights the potential of AI-powered adaptive learning systems to modify existing educational paradigms by comparing and contrasting with earlier studies. The ramifications of these findings for educators, politicians, and researchers are examined, highlighting the importance of intelligent technological integration in education while also addressing ethical concerns. While this study provides useful insights, it also admits limits and offers future research directions. These findings provide useful information for utilizing AI's potential to enhance mathematics education and pave the path for a more effective and inclusive learning environment in the age of technology-driven education.
Downloads
References
Alamri, H. A., Watson, S., & Watson, W. (2021). Learning technology models that support personalization within blended learning environments in higher education. TechTrends, 65, 62-78.
Bhutoria, A. (2022). Personalized education and artificial intelligence in the United States, China, and India: A systematic review using a human-in-the-loop model. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 3, 100068.
Campbell, B. A., Lapsey, D. S., & Wells, W. (2020). An evaluation of Kentucky’s sexual assault investigator training: Results from a randomized three-group experiment. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 16, 625-647.
Daniel, M., Gordon, M., Patricio, M., Hider, A., Pawlik, C., Bhagdev, R., ... & Stojan, J. (2021). An update on developments in medical education in response to the COVID-19 pandemic: A BEME scoping review: BEME Guide No. 64. Medical teacher, 43(3), 253-271.
Dubovi, I. (2022). Cognitive and emotional engagement while learning with VR: The perspective of multimodal methodology. Computers & Education, 183, 104495.
Goad, T., Towner, B., Jones, E., & Bulger, S. (2019). Instructional tools for online physical education: Using mobile technologies to enhance learning. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation & Dance, 90(6), 40-47.
Liton, H. A. (2021). Social media tools accentuating self-directed personal learning trajectories: Underpinning autonomous learning hub.
Muñoz, J. L. R., Ojeda, F. M., Jurado, D. L. A., Peña, P. F. P., Carranza, C. P. M., Berríos, H. Q., ... & Vasquez-Pauca, M. J. (2022). Systematic review of adaptive learning technology for learning in higher education. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 98(98), 221-233.
Primbs, R., Feldmann, L., Iglhaut, L., Allgaier, A. K., Schulte-Körne, G., & Greimel, E. (2023). Evaluation of an information booklet for adolescents on depression: evidence from a randomized controlled study. Child and adolescent psychiatry and mental health, 17(1), 65.
Ristić, I., Runić Ristić, M., Savić Tot, T., Tot, V., & Bajac, M. (2023). The effects and effectiveness of an adaptive e-learning system on the learning process and performance of students. International Journal of Cognitive Research in Science, Engineering and Education (IJCRSEE), 11(1), 77-92.
Shums’kyi, O. L. (2020). Use Of It For Future Foreign Language Teachers’linguistic Self-Education. Information Technologies and Learning Tools, 75(1), 269-278.
Slimi, Z., & Carballido, B. V. (2023). Navigating the Ethical Challenges of Artificial Intelligence in Higher Education: An Analysis of Seven Global AI Ethics Policies. TEM Journal, 12(2).
Soffer, T., & Cohen, A. (2019). Students' engagement characteristics predict success and completion of online courses. Journal of computer assisted learning, 35(3), 378-389.
Ullah, M., Hamayun, S., Wahab, A., Khan, S. U., Qayum, M., Ullah, A., ... & Naeem, M. (2023). Smart Technologies used as Smart Tools in the Management of Cardiovascular Disease and their Future Perspective. Current Problems in Cardiology, 101922.
Vanbecelaere, S., Van den Berghe, K., Cornillie, F., Sasanguie, D., Reynvoet, B., & Depaepe, F. (2020). The effectiveness of adaptive versus non‐adaptive learning with digital educational games. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 36(4), 502-513.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Interdisciplinary Journal Papier Human Review

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
























