Community Development (CD) in Petroleum Industry of South Sudan: A Contextual Review

Authors

  • Jacob Dut Chol Riak Senior Researcher and Associate Professor, Department of Political Science, Director (Dean), Institute of Japanese Studies, University of Juba, South Sudan

Keywords:

South Sudan, Petroleum Industry, Community Development, Approach, Participatory, Non-Participatory, Community Development Committees, Joint Operating Companies

Abstract

Community Development (CD), though a crucial element within the petroleum industry, has historically been neglected and insufficiently studied, particularly in relation to Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR). This disregard has led to CD initiatives being implemented remotely, with limited effectiveness. In South Sudan, despite having a mature and robust petroleum sector operating through three Joint Operating Companies (JOCs) in blocks 3 & 7, 1, 2 & 4, and 5A, CD programs and projects have largely employed a non-participatory (top-down) approach. As a result, communities often fail to take ownership of projects, leading to unsustainable development and eventual collapse of initiatives. The study emphasizes the importance of a participatory (bottom-up) model in which communities are at the core of all petroleum industry processes—from exploration, appraisal, development, and drilling, to production and decommissioning. The proposed model advocates for comprehensive community consultation and positions Participatory Rural Appraisal (PRA) as the central methodology. PRA enables communities to identify, prioritize, and address their most pressing issues through the creation and execution of a Community Action Plan (CAP). Using a case study approach, the research examined CD departments across all JOCs in South Sudan. It concludes that while the petroleum industry is capital-intensive, it is equally people-intensive and must be led by the communities themselves. It further recommends that Community Development Committees (CDCs) be directly elected and managed by locals, free from political influence, to ensure effective, inclusive, and sustainable development.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Brett, E. A. (2003). Participation and accountability in development management. The journal of development studies, 40(2), 1-29. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220380412331293747

Chambers, R. (1994). The origins and practice of participatory rural appraisal. World development, 22(7), 953-969. https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-750X(94)90141-4

Cisse, H. (2013). Legal Empowerment of the Poor: Past, Present, Future. World Bank Legal Rev., 4, 31.

Dinbabo, M. F. (2003). Development theories, participatory approaches and community development. Unpublished paper. Bellville: Institute for Social Development, University of the Western Cape.

Idemudia, U., & Osayande, N. (2018). Assessing the effect of corporate social responsibility on community development in the Niger Delta: A corporate perspective. Community Development Journal, 53(1), 155-172. https://doi.org/10.1093/cdj/bsw019

Kaiser, M. S. (2020). Are bottom-up approaches in development more effective than top-down approaches?. Journal of Asian Social Science Research, 2(1), 91-109. https://doi.org/10.15575/jassr.v2i1.20

Kapelus, P. (2002). Mining, corporate social responsibility and the" community": The case of Rio Tinto, Richards Bay Minerals and the Mbonambi. Journal of business ethics, 39(3), 275-296. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016570929359

Nwapi, C. (2017). Legal and institutional frameworks for community development agreements in the mining sector in Africa. The Extractive Industries and Society, 4(1), 202-215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exis.2016.11.010

Odumosu-Ayanu, I. T. (2012). Foreign direct investment catalysts in West Africa: interactions with local content laws and industry-community agreements. NC Cent. L. Rev., 35, 65.

Otto, D. (1996). Subalternity and international law: the problems of global community and the incommensurability of difference. Social & Legal Studies, 5(3), 337-364. https://doi.org/10.1177/096466399600500304

Riak, J. (2024). The petroleum industry of south sudan: Institutions, trends, legal regimes and leaderships.

United Nations University. International Human Dimensions Programme on Global Environmenatal Change (Ed.). (2015). Inclusive Wealth Report 2014. Cambridge University Press.

Watson, N. (1997). Why we argue about virtual community: A case study of the phish. net fan community. Virtual culture: Identity and communication in cybersociety, 102-132.

Weiland, S., Hickmann, T., Lederer, M., Marquardt, J., & Schwindenhammer, S. (2021). The 2030 agenda for sustainable development: transformative change through the sustainable development goals?. Politics and Governance, 9(1), 90-95. https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v9i1.4191

Wendt, A. (1992). Anarchy is what states make of it: the social construction of power politics. International organization, 46(2), 391-425. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818300027764

Downloads

Published

2025-07-03

How to Cite

Riak, J. D. C. (2025). Community Development (CD) in Petroleum Industry of South Sudan: A Contextual Review. International Journal Papier Advance and Scientific Review, 6(1), 19-27. Retrieved from https://igsspublication.com/index.php/ijpasr/article/view/378