The Implementation of Agile Government in Achieving Public Service Efficiency
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47667/ijppr.v5i4.320Keywords:
Agile Government, Public Service Mall, Service Adaptability, Collaboration, Digital TransformationAbstract
This study examines the implementation of Agile Government as a strategy to enhance public service efficiency. Agile Government, derived from Agile methodologies in software development, is increasingly recognized for its potential to make public administration more flexible, adaptive, and responsive to rapidly changing societal needs. The research is based on a comprehensive literature review, focusing on case studies such as the Public Service Mall in Parepare City, Indonesia, and other international examples. The findings reveal that Agile Government can significantly improve the accessibility, reliability, and responsiveness of public services by allowing governments to quickly adapt to regulatory changes and societal demands. Furthermore, Agile Government promotes greater public participation in decision-making processes, enhancing transparency and accountability. However, the implementation of Agile Government faces challenges, including the need for organizational cultural change, stakeholder support, investment in technology, and effective cross-sector coordination. Addressing these challenges is crucial for realizing the full potential of Agile Government in achieving efficient, inclusive, and responsive public service delivery. This study contributes to the growing body of knowledge on public administration reform and provides valuable insights for policymakers and public administrators aiming to implement Agile Government strategies.Downloads
References
Beck, K., Beedle, M., van Bennekum, A., Cockburn, A., Cunningham, W., Fowler, M., ... & Thomas, D. (2001). Manifesto for agile software development.
Bryson, J. M., Crosby, B. C., & Bloomberg, L. (2014). Public Value Governance: Moving Beyond Traditional Public Administration and the New Public Management. Public Administration Review, 74(4), 445-456.
Christensen, T., & Lægreid, P. (2011). The Ashgate Research Companion to New Public Management. Routledge.
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2017). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches. Sage Publications.
Denhardt, J. V., & Denhardt, R. B. (2015). The New Public Service: Serving, Not Steering. Routledge.
Djalante, R., Shaw, R., & DeWit, A. (2020). Building resilience against biological hazards and pandemics: COVID-19 and its implications for the Sendai Framework. Progress in Disaster Science, 6, 100080.
Janssen, M., & Van der Voort, H. (2020). Agile and adaptive governance in crisis response: Lessons from the COVID-19 pandemic. International Journal of Information Management, 55, 102-152.
Kotter, J. P. (2012). Leading Change. Harvard Business Review Press.
Li, Y., & Fan, Y. (2023). Making governance agile: Exploring the role of artificial intelligence in China’s local governance. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 36(2), 123-145.
Luna, A. A., Kruchten, P., & Moura, A. V. (2015). Agile Governance Theory: Concept and Mechanisms. IEEE Software, 32(5), 30-36.
Mergel, I. (2016). Agile innovation management in government: A research agenda. Government Information Quarterly, 33(3), 516-523.
Osborne, S. P., & Brown, K. (2011). Managing Change and Innovation in Public Service Organizations. Routledge.
Schein, E. H. (2017). Organizational Culture and Leadership. John Wiley & Sons.
Sapri. (2024). Implementasi Kebijakan Pelayanan Publik (Studi Agile Government Pada Mal Pelayanan Publik Kota Parepare). Disertasi, Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Surabaya.
Tapscott, D. (2008). Grown Up Digital: How the Net Generation is Changing Your World. McGraw-Hill Professional.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 International Journal Papier Public Review

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.