Unique Interpretation of Necessity and Freedom in the Philosophy of Ibn Rushd Based on the Rejection of the Opinions of His Contemporaries

Abstract

The article delves into Ibn Rushd's perspectives on the notions of freedom and necessity, as a prominent figure within the Eastern Peripatetic movement. His stance is elucidated through his rejection of the prevailing notions held by his peers. Within the medieval philosophical landscape, the discourse surrounding freedom and necessity often revolved around reconciling religious and philosophical ideologies. The article particularly highlights discussions on fate and volition. In response to the controversy over whether people's actions are carried out by the necessity of fate or by their independent arbitrary actions, Ibn Rushd gives his arguments.