Implementation of Social Welfare (DTKS) Integrated Data Program through the Next Generation Social Welfare Information System (SIKS NG)

Muh. Firyal Akbar; Sakbir Sakbir; Sitrun Malipi; Nirmala Afrianti Sahi

doi:10.47667/ijppr.v4i2.214

Authors

Muh. Firyal Akbar Public Administration Study Program, Muhammadiyah University of Gorontalo, Indonesia
Sakbir Public Administration Study Program, Muhammadiyah University of Gorontalo, Indonesia
Sitrun Malipi Public Administration Study Program, Muhammadiyah University of Gorontalo, Indonesia
Nirmala Afrianti Sahi Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, University of Gorontalo, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47667/ijppr.v4i2.214

Keywords:

Next Generation, Social Welfare, Information System

Abstract

This study aims to describe the Implementation of the Social Welfare Integrated Data Program (DTKS) through the Next Generation Social Welfare Information System (SIKS NG) in Huntu Village, Batudaa District, Gorontalo Regency. The research method uses a qualitative approach by collecting data through observation, interviews and documentation. The results of the study show that of the four indicators, there are three indicators that are considered optimal, namely communication, disposition, and bureaucratic structure. Meanwhile, one other indicator, namely the resource indicator, is considered not optimal, which can be seen from the use of the Social Welfare System-Next Generation (SIKS-NG) application, which often experiences interruptions or errors when inputting data and the unstable network system in the Huntu rural area, especially in the Office Hunter Village.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

A. G Subarsono. (2011). Analisis Kebijakan Publik (konsep. teori dan aplikasi). Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar

Agustino, L. (2008). Dasar-dasar Kebijakan Publik. Bandung: CV. Alfabeta.

Arikunto, S. (2013). Dasar-Dasar Evaluasi Pendidikan, edisi revisi. Yogyakarta: Bumi Aksara

Edward III, G. C. (1980). Implementing Public Policy. Washington DC: Congressional Quarterly Press

Grigalashvili, V. (2022). E-government and E-governance: Various or Multifarious Concepts. International Journal of Scientific and Management Research, 5(01), 183-196.

Indrajit., R. E. (2005). E-Government in action. Yogyakarta: Andi Offset

Jumroh, M. S., & Pratama, M. Y. J. (2021). Implementasi Pelayanan Publik Teori dan Praktik.

Mensah, I. K., & Mwakapesa, D. S. (2023). The impact of e-government information quality (EGIQ) dimensions on the adoption of electronic government services. Information Development, 02666669231155164.

Semiawan, C. R. (2010). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif. Jakarta: Grasindo.

Špaček, D., Csótó, M., & Urs, N. (2020). Questioning the real citizen-centricity of e-government development: Digitalization of G2C services in selected CEE countries. NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy, 13(1), 213-243.

Stojanovska-Stefanova, A., Aleksoski, O., & Magdinceva Sopova, M. (2020). E-government and digital public services: The Macedonian case of digitalization. SocioBrains, International scientific refereed online journal with impact factor, 7(74), 35-52.

Sugiyono. (2015). Memahami Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: Alfabeta

Sulistiawaty, T., Surahman, F., Puspaningrum, I. I., & Wicaksono, Y. (2021). The impact of knowledge management, administrative management, information technology for e-government success. Annals of the Romanian Society for Cell Biology, 25(4), 12728-12741.

Usman, M., Lamangida, T., & Akbar, M. F. (2021). Implementation of Waste Management Policy with 3R Principles (Reduse, Reuse, Recycle) in the Gorontalo City. Journal of Public Representative and Society Provision, 1(1), 29-37.

Winarno, Budi. (2002). Kebijakan Publik: Teori dan Proses. Yogyakarta: Media Presindo