Risks Associated with the Use of Insecticides in Cowpea Conservation


  • Chikezie Amare Faculty of Basic Medical Sciences, Niger Delta University, Nigeria
  • Ezeudo Golibe Faculty of Basic Medical Sciences, Niger Delta University, Nigeria
  • Angela Adelusi Faculty of Basic Medical Sciences, Niger Delta University, Nigeria




Storage, Insecticides, Poisoning, Human Health, Environmental Pollution


The use of insecticides by actors in the cowpea value chain highlights the problem of the supposed or real risks of these products with respect to man and his environment. To assess the health and environmental risks generated by these insecticides, we conducted surveys of 100 cowpea producers, 100 insecticide traders, 100 cowpea traders and 100 consumers. According to the results of the surveys, 13 chemicals including 7 pyrethroids, 4 organophosphates and 2 organochlorines are used by cowpea producers and traders in the conservation of cowpea in the central region. Among these insecticides only 2 are approved and the 11 others come from neighboring countries of Burkina Faso, namely Ghana and Togo, despite the control of plant protection and packaging services. The majority of actors surveyed are illiterate (95%). The lack of training and ignorance of the regulations in force on pesticides by insecticide traders, the misuse of chemicals before and after use are factors of environmental pollution. The lack of appropriate protective equipment, ignorance of the existence of approved products and poor food storage conditions create food poisoning among consumers and serious health risks for farmers and traders.


Download data is not yet available.


Damalas, C. A. (2009). Understanding benefits and risks of pesticide use. Scientific Research and Essays, 4(10), 945-949.

Dugravot, S., Sanon, A., Thibout, E., & Huignard, J. (2002). Susceptibility of Callosobruchus maculatus (Coleoptera: Bruchidae) and its parasitoid Dinarmus basalis (Hymenoptera: Pteromalidae) to sulphur-containing compounds: consequences on biological control. Environmental entomology, 31(3), 550-557.

Galt, R. E. (2013). From homo economicus to complex subjectivities: Reconceptualizing farmers as pesticide users. Antipode, 45(2), 336-356.

Kamel, F., & Hoppin, J. A. (2004). Association of pesticide exposure with neurologic dysfunction and disease. Environmental health perspectives, 112(9), 950-958.

Lawson, A. J., Akohou, H., Lorge, S., & Schiffers, B. (2017). Three methods to assess levels of farmers’ exposure to pesticides in the urban and peri-urban areas of Northern Benin. Tunisian Journal of Plant Protection, 12(1), 91-108.

Machová, K., Barcak, F., & Bednár, P. (2006). A bagging method using decision trees in the role of base classifiers. Acta Polytechnica Hungarica, 3(2), 121-132.

Matthews, G. (2008). Pesticide application methods. John Wiley & Sons.

Nwosu, L. C., Azeez, O. M., Eluwa, A. N., & Petgrave, G. M. (2020). Two stubborn storage insect pests, Callosobruchus maculatus and Sitophilus zeamais: Biology, food security problems and control strategies. International Research Journal of Insect Sciences, 5(1), 7-13.

Ramzan, S., Liu, C., Munir, H., & Xu, Y. (2019). Assessing young consumers’ awareness and participation in sustainable e-waste management practices: a survey study in Northwest China. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 26(19), 20003-20013.

Singh, A., Dhiman, N., Kar, A. K., Singh, D., Purohit, M. P., Ghosh, D., & Patnaik, S. (2020). Advances in controlled release pesticide formulations: Prospects to safer integrated pest management and sustainable agriculture. Journal of hazardous materials, 385, 121525




How to Cite

Amare, C., Golibe, E. ., & Adelusi, A. . (2022). Risks Associated with the Use of Insecticides in Cowpea Conservation . International Journal Papier Advance and Scientific Review, 3(1), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.47667/ijpasr.v3i1.139