Frontline Employee Organizational Behavior based on street level bureaucracy reviews

Authors

  • Marianus Dabingaya The University of Papua New Guinea, PNG

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47667/ijphr.v1i1.5

Keywords:

Organization, Behavior, Employees

Abstract

This article discusses organizational behavior is the result of interactions between individuals in an organization. The reality of public administration in a 'street level' bureaucracy is that it cannot operate hierarchically because the agency has to rely on street-level bureaucrats to provide services. The orientation of street level bureaucracy towards regulations and procedures is very high and makes it a barometer of service which results in low ability of street level bureaucracy to respond to changes, lack of initiative and development of creativity in controlling change so that routine is considered something normal. Understanding human behavior is a difficult thing because every human being as an individual has different behavior. Street-level bureaucrats have so much discretion that the problem is found in a lack of accountability either to the wider community, to management, or to clients.

References

Prottas, J. M. (1978). The power of the street-level bureaucrat in public service bureaucracies. Urban Affairs Quarterly, 13(3), 285-312.

Mosher, F. C. (1992). Public administration old and new: A letter from Frederick C. Mosher. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory: J-PART, 2(2), 199-202.

Hudson, B. (1989). Michael Lipsky and street level bureaucracy: a neglected perspective. Disability and dependency, 41-52.

Michael, L. (1980). Street-level bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the individual in public services. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

Newstrom, J. W., Davis, K., & Pierce, J. L. (1993). Organizational behavior: Human behavior at work.

Griffin, R. W., O'Leary-Kelly, A., & Pritchard, R. D. (2004). The dark side of organizational behavior (pp. 23-61). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Schneider, B. (1982). Interactional psychology and organizational behavior. Michigan State Univ East Lansing Dept of Psychology.

Kickul, J., Lester, S. W., & Finkl, J. (2002). Promise breaking during radical organizational change: do justice interventions make a difference?. Journal of Organizational Behavior: The International Journal of Industrial, Occupational and Organizational Psychology and Behavior, 23(4), 469-488.

Evans, T., & Harris, J. (2004). Street-level bureaucracy, social work and the (exaggerated) death of discretion. The British Journal of Social Work, 34(6), 871-895.

Keiser, L. R. (1999). State bureaucratic discretion and the administration of social welfare programs: The case of social security disability. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 9(1), 87-106.

Downloads

Published

2020-08-30